RIYA DINDA vs SASANKA DINDA Advocate - TARAKNATH BAGANI — 485/2025

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13B. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

1.Matrimonial Suit - Matrimonial Suit

CNR: WBHW010016502025

Filing Number

1237/2025

Filing Date

16-Apr-2025

Registration No

485/2025

Registration Date

16-Apr-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Howrah

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RIYA DINDA

    Adv. KAZI SAHABUL ISALM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SASANKA DINDA Advocate - TARAKNATH BAGANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    Case Summary – Mat Suit No. 485/2025 The District Judge, Howrah granted a mutual consent divorce decree dissolving the marriage of Riya Dinda and Sasanka Dinda solemnized on 05.08.2017. The court found no collusion, coercion, or undue influence in the joint petition filed under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, confirmed the six-month waiting period had elapsed, and noted that custody of their child was settled. Each party bears their respective costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Appearance and Hearing

    District Judge

  6. 18-Nov-2025

    General OrdersView PDF

  7. 18-Nov-2025

    Appearance and Hearing

    District Judge

  8. 16-Apr-2025

    General OrdersView PDF

  9. 16-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 16-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 485/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary – Mat Suit No. 485/2025 The District Judge, Howrah granted a mutual consent divorce decree dissolving the marriage of Riya Dinda and Sasanka Dinda solemnized on 05.08.2017. The court found no collusion, coercion, or undue influence in the joint petition filed under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, confirmed the six-month waiting period had elapsed, and noted that custody of their child was settled. Each party bears their respective costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case