STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs SK MOJAMMEL ALI ALIAS SK NAREN ALIAS MOJAMMEL AND ANOTHER Advocate - SAMIR SAMANTA — 490/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBHW010012962026

Filing Number

744/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

490/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Howrah

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 20-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

84

Police Station

SHYAMPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

    Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SK MOJAMMEL ALI ALIAS SK NAREN ALIAS MOJAMMEL AND ANOTHER Advocate - SAMIR SAMANTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    Summary The Howrah Sessions Court rejected anticipatory bail for Sk. Mojammel Ali (petitioner 1) in a theft case, finding specific assault allegations against him, but granted anticipatory bail to Sk. Easdam (petitioner 2) as allegations against him were generalized with no specific acts attributed. Both applicants must comply with bail conditions including furnishing bond, availability for interrogation, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 490/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Howrah Sessions Court rejected anticipatory bail for Sk. Mojammel Ali (petitioner 1) in a theft case, finding specific assault allegations against him, but granted anticipatory bail to Sk. Easdam (petitioner 2) as allegations against him were generalized with no specific acts attributed. Both applicants must comply with bail conditions including furnishing bond, availability for interrogation, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case