STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs MD KAMIL JAMIL Advocate - DHRUBAJYOTI GAYEN — 489/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBHW010012942026

Filing Number

742/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

489/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Howrah

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

04

Police Station

HOWRAH GRP SHALIMAR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

    Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MD KAMIL JAMIL Advocate - DHRUBAJYOTI GAYEN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Cr. Misc. Case 489/2026 The Howrah Sessions Court rejected Md. Kamil Jamil's anticipatory bail application in a theft case involving articles valued at Rs. 36.5 lakhs from a railway development project. The court found that the petitioner's prior criminal antecedents under the RP(UP) Act, combined with co-accused statements implicating him, posed significant risks to investigation and recovery of stolen property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 489/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr. Misc. Case 489/2026 The Howrah Sessions Court rejected Md. Kamil Jamil's anticipatory bail application in a theft case involving articles valued at Rs. 36.5 lakhs from a railway development project. The court found that the petitioner's prior criminal antecedents under the RP(UP) Act, combined with co-accused statements implicating him, posed significant risks to investigation and recovery of stolen property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case