STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs SHAMAPADA MONDAL ALIAS SHAYAMA PADA MONDAL AND 4 ORS Advocate - SAZID KHAN — 467/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBHW010012432026

Filing Number

718/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

467/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Howrah

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

105

Police Station

BAGNAN

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

    Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAMAPADA MONDAL ALIAS SHAYAMA PADA MONDAL AND 4 ORS Advocate - SAZID KHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    Case 467/2026 Summary: The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to five accused persons (Shamapada Mondal, Samrat Mondal, Bankim Mondal, Srabani Mondal, and Rina Mondal) in a case arising from a property dispute registered under BNS sections 329(4), 115(2), 76, 109, 316(2), and 3(5). The court found that the injury report showed no grievous injury, no torn clothing was seized, the victim refused to provide a statement, and the accused had no criminal antecedents, warranting bail on conditions including a Rs. 2,000 bond with surety, police interrogation availability, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 467/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 467/2026 Summary: The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to five accused persons (Shamapada Mondal, Samrat Mondal, Bankim Mondal, Srabani Mondal, and Rina Mondal) in a case arising from a property dispute registered under BNS sections 329(4), 115(2), 76, 109, 316(2), and 3(5). The court found that the injury report showed no grievous injury, no torn clothing was seized, the victim refused to provide a statement, and the accused had no criminal antecedents, warranting bail on conditions including a Rs. 2,000 bond with surety, police interrogation availability, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case