STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs SHAMAPADA MONDAL ALIAS SHAYAMA PADA MONDAL AND 4 ORS Advocate - SAZID KHAN — 467/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBHW010012432026
Filing Number
718/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
467/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Howrah
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
105
Police Station
BAGNAN
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE
Respondent(s)
SHAMAPADA MONDAL ALIAS SHAYAMA PADA MONDAL AND 4 ORS Advocate - SAZID KHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Disposed
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-03-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 467/2026 Summary: The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to five accused persons (Shamapada Mondal, Samrat Mondal, Bankim Mondal, Srabani Mondal, and Rina Mondal) in a case arising from a property dispute registered under BNS sections 329(4), 115(2), 76, 109, 316(2), and 3(5). The court found that the injury report showed no grievous injury, no torn clothing was seized, the victim refused to provide a statement, and the accused had no criminal antecedents, warranting bail on conditions including a Rs. 2,000 bond with surety, police interrogation availability, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case 467/2026 Summary: The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to five accused persons (Shamapada Mondal, Samrat Mondal, Bankim Mondal, Srabani Mondal, and Rina Mondal) in a case arising from a property dispute registered under BNS sections 329(4), 115(2), 76, 109, 316(2), and 3(5). The court found that the injury report showed no grievous injury, no torn clothing was seized, the victim refused to provide a statement, and the accused had no criminal antecedents, warranting bail on conditions including a Rs. 2,000 bond with surety, police interrogation availability, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts