STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs PAYEL JANA Advocate - ANSHUMAN DUTTA — 466/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 6. Disposed: Uncontested--OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBHW010012412026

Filing Number

717/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

466/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Howrah

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--OTHERWISE

Last updated 20-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

256

Police Station

AMTA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

    Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PAYEL JANA Advocate - ANSHUMAN DUTTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Howrah granted permission to accused Payel Jana to travel outside India for three months (or until the final report is submitted, whichever is earlier), relaxing the anticipatory bail condition that prohibited international travel. The court found that denying permission would jeopardize her employment as Cabin Crew with Etihad Airways and infringe her right to livelihood, and the Public Prosecutor raised no objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 466/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Howrah granted permission to accused Payel Jana to travel outside India for three months (or until the final report is submitted, whichever is earlier), relaxing the anticipatory bail condition that prohibited international travel. The court found that denying permission would jeopardize her employment as Cabin Crew with Etihad Airways and infringe her right to livelihood, and the Public Prosecutor raised no objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case