STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs KAZI ARIFUL ALIAS KAZI AFIRUL ISLAM AND ANOTHER Advocate - MONJUR ELAHI — 464/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th March 2026.
1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBHW010012392026
Filing Number
715/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
464/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Howrah
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
208
Police Station
JOYPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE
Respondent(s)
-
1.KAZI ARIFUL ALIAS KAZI AFIRUL ISLAM AND ANOTHER Advocate - MONJUR ELAHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
Final OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 464/2026 The Howrah Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to accused Kazi Ariful Islam and Kazi Suraf Uddin in a case where a charge sheet had already been filed under BNS sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/76/3(5). The court found that since investigation concluded, the accused were not proclaimed offenders, and another co-accused had already received bail, granting relief was appropriate after applying established anticipatory bail criteria. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
General OrdersView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
General OrdersView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
General OrdersView PDF
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 464/2026
Case Summary: 464/2026 The Howrah Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to accused Kazi Ariful Islam and Kazi Suraf Uddin in a case where a charge sheet had already been filed under BNS sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/76/3(5). The court found that since investigation concluded, the accused were not proclaimed offenders, and another co-accused had already received bail, granting relief was appropriate after applying established anticipatory bail criteria. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts