STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs ASLAM KHAN AND ANOTHER — 463/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBHW010012312026

Filing Number

714/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

463/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Howrah

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

25

Police Station

HOWRAH GRP HOWRAH

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

    Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASLAM KHAN AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Aslam Khan & Another (463/2026) The Sessions Judge, Howrah allowed the bail application of accused Aslam Khan and Md. Tamanne under Section 483 BNSS, holding that their detention in custody since 23.02.2026 was unjustified as no seizure was effected from them and the investigation had stalled. The court released both accused on furnishing bond of Rs.3,000 each with two registered sureties of Rs.1,500 each, conditional upon meeting the investigating officer weekly until investigation completion, emphasizing that detention during investigation should not serve as punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 463/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Aslam Khan & Another (463/2026) The Sessions Judge, Howrah allowed the bail application of accused Aslam Khan and Md. Tamanne under Section 483 BNSS, holding that their detention in custody since 23.02.2026 was unjustified as no seizure was effected from them and the investigation had stalled. The court released both accused on furnishing bond of Rs.3,000 each with two registered sureties of Rs.1,500 each, conditional upon meeting the investigating officer weekly until investigation completion, emphasizing that detention during investigation should not serve as punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case