STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs AFTAB SK ALIAS BOM AND ANOTHER — 462/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBHW010012302026

Filing Number

713/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

462/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Howrah

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

25

Police Station

HOWRAH GRP HOWRAH

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

    Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AFTAB SK ALIAS BOM AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: The Sessions Judge, Howrah granted bail to accused Aftab Sk @ Bom and Kasim in a case under sections 310(4)/310(5) of BNS, finding that they had already suffered sufficient detention since 11.02.2026 and the investigation had stalled. The court held that pre-trial detention should not be used as punishment and ordered their release on furnishing bonds of Rs. 3,000 each with two sureties of Rs. 1,500 each, on condition they meet the investigating officer weekly until investigation completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 462/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Sessions Judge, Howrah granted bail to accused Aftab Sk @ Bom and Kasim in a case under sections 310(4)/310(5) of BNS, finding that they had already suffered sufficient detention since 11.02.2026 and the investigation had stalled. The court held that pre-trial detention should not be used as punishment and ordered their release on furnishing bonds of Rs. 3,000 each with two sureties of Rs. 1,500 each, on condition they meet the investigating officer weekly until investigation completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case