STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs AAMIR SHAKIL AND 2 ORS — 459/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 31st March 2026.
1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBHW010012232026
Filing Number
710/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
459/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Howrah
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
42
Police Station
SHIBPUR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE
Respondent(s)
AAMIR SHAKIL AND 2 ORS
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Disposed
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition |
| 16-03-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition |
| 13-03-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition |
| 02-03-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 459/2026 Summary: The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to three accused (Aamir Shakil, Sabrun Nesha, and Shahnaz Parveen) in a matrimonial dispute case involving allegations of physical/mental cruelty and assault. The court found the allegations arose from matrimonial differences and were insufficiently substantiated—the victim's injury report showed no marks or bleeding, the miscarriage was not clearly attributable to the accused's conduct, and only one specific incident was documented. The court determined no criminal antecedents existed and the prosecution lacked genuine merit. Bail was granted on bond of Rs. 10,000 each with conditions including availability for interrogation and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case 459/2026 Summary: The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to three accused (Aamir Shakil, Sabrun Nesha, and Shahnaz Parveen) in a matrimonial dispute case involving allegations of physical/mental cruelty and assault. The court found the allegations arose from matrimonial differences and were insufficiently substantiated—the victim's injury report showed no marks or bleeding, the miscarriage was not clearly attributable to the accused's conduct, and only one specific incident was documented. The court determined no criminal antecedents existed and the prosecution lacked genuine merit. Bail was granted on bond of Rs. 10,000 each with conditions including availability for interrogation and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts