STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs ABHISEK SHARMA Advocate - NILANJAN PANDIT — 443/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th April 2026.
1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBHW010011862026
Filing Number
690/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
443/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Howrah
Judge
3-ADJ II
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
139
Police Station
AJC Bose B.Garden
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE
Respondent(s)
ABHISEK SHARMA Advocate - NILANJAN PANDIT
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADJ II
Disposed
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-04-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition |
| 06-04-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition |
| 13-03-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition |
| 27-02-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected accused Abhisek Sharma's bail application under Section 483 BNSS in a murder case arising from a July 2025 incident where a young man died from head injuries. While eyewitness testimony primarily implicated co-accused Suvajit Maity as the direct assailant, the court found sufficient evidence of Sharma's presence at the crime scene and role in the alleged criminal conspiracy, noting that awareness of the ultimate violent outcome is immaterial to conspiracy charges. The court directed expedited proceedings without adjournment, with the next hearing fixed for charge consideration on 27 April 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court rejected accused Abhisek Sharma's bail application under Section 483 BNSS in a murder case arising from a July 2025 incident where a young man died from head injuries. While eyewitness testimony primarily implicated co-accused Suvajit Maity as the direct assailant, the court found sufficient evidence of Sharma's presence at the crime scene and role in the alleged criminal conspiracy, noting that awareness of the ultimate violent outcome is immaterial to conspiracy charges. The court directed expedited proceedings without adjournment, with the next hearing fixed for charge consideration on 27 April 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts