STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs PROVASH KAR ALIAS LALTU Advocate - SANJOY MUKHERJEE — 432/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBHW010011612026

Filing Number

677/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

432/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Howrah

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 20-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

38

Police Station

Dasnagar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

    Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PROVASH KAR ALIAS LALTU Advocate - SANJOY MUKHERJEE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge at Howrah granted bail to accused Provash Kar @ Laltu in a case involving charges under BNS sections 310(4)/310(5), finding that prolonged detention during investigation serves no further investigative purpose and that the investigation has stalled. The court released the accused on a bond of Rs. 5,000 with two sureties of Rs. 2,500 each, conditional upon meeting the investigating officer weekly until investigation completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 432/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge at Howrah granted bail to accused Provash Kar @ Laltu in a case involving charges under BNS sections 310(4)/310(5), finding that prolonged detention during investigation serves no further investigative purpose and that the investigation has stalled. The court released the accused on a bond of Rs. 5,000 with two sureties of Rs. 2,500 each, conditional upon meeting the investigating officer weekly until investigation completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case