STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs SK KAYEN ALI AND 4 ORS Advocate - SANJOY MUKHERJEE — 429/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBHW010011502026

Filing Number

673/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

429/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Howrah

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 03-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

64

Police Station

BAGNAN

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

    Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SK KAYEN ALI AND 4 ORS Advocate - SANJOY MUKHERJEE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to five accused persons (Sk. Kayem Ali, Sk Azad Ali, Sk. Kaosar Ali, Sk. Sahaalam, and Sk. Sabir Ali) in a theft case, finding no criminal antecedents and noting that similar accused were already granted bail. The bail was granted subject to conditions including furnishing a bond of Rs. 3,000 each with sureties, availability for police interrogation, and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 429/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to five accused persons (Sk. Kayem Ali, Sk Azad Ali, Sk. Kaosar Ali, Sk. Sahaalam, and Sk. Sabir Ali) in a theft case, finding no criminal antecedents and noting that similar accused were already granted bail. The bail was granted subject to conditions including furnishing a bond of Rs. 3,000 each with sureties, availability for police interrogation, and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case