STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs SALAHAR BEGUM AND 6 ORS Advocate - SAZID KHAN — 427/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.

1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBHW010011432026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

670/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

427/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Howrah

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

97

Police Station

BAGNAN

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

SALAHAR BEGUM AND 6 ORS Advocate - SAZID KHAN

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge

10-03-2026

Disposed

26-02-2026

Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
FINAL ORDER

Summary The Sessions Judge, Howrah, rejected the anticipatory bail applications of all seven accused petitioners in a case involving serious injuries caused to the victim. The court found that medical evidence and photographs established grave injuries, the FIR indicated prior coordination among the accused, and custodial detention was necessary for complete investigation; the court held that accused persons acting in furtherance of common intention cannot evade liability by claiming individual non-involvement in specific acts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

26-02-2026
General Orders
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge, Howrah, rejected the anticipatory bail applications of all seven accused petitioners in a case involving serious injuries caused to the victim. The court found that medical evidence and photographs established grave injuries, the FIR indicated prior coordination among the accused, and custodial detention was necessary for complete investigation; the court held that accused persons acting in furtherance of common intention cannot evade liability by claiming individual non-involvement in specific acts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, Howrah All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case