STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs PALASH HAZRA AND ONE ANOTHER Advocate - SOUBHIK RAY — 426/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBHW010011422026

Filing Number

669/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

426/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Howrah

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 03-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

417

Police Station

PANCHLA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

    Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PALASH HAZRA AND ONE ANOTHER Advocate - SOUBHIK RAY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    The Howrah Sessions Court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by parents Palash Hazra and Kanak Hazra in a child marriage case involving their son and a minor girl who allegedly eloped and subsequently lived together as husband and wife in the parents' residence. The court found the allegations grave, involving potential violations of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act and POCSO Act provisions, and declined to grant pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 426/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Howrah Sessions Court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by parents Palash Hazra and Kanak Hazra in a child marriage case involving their son and a minor girl who allegedly eloped and subsequently lived together as husband and wife in the parents' residence. The court found the allegations grave, involving potential violations of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act and POCSO Act provisions, and declined to grant pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case