STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs BIKASH KUMAR RAY ALIAS VIKASH KYMAR RAY ALIAS BIKASH RAY Advocate - SUBHASIS BHATTACHARJEE — 424/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBHW010011332026

Filing Number

664/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

424/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Howrah

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 03-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

357

Police Station

HOWRAH

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

    Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BIKASH KUMAR RAY ALIAS VIKASH KYMAR RAY ALIAS BIKASH RAY Advocate - SUBHASIS BHATTACHARJEE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Judge rejected the accused's second anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS, holding that the submission of a chargesheet does not constitute a change in circumstances warranting a fresh application after an earlier rejection on 23.09.2025. The court relied on the Supreme Court's judgment in Virupakshappa Gouda Vs. State of Karnataka, establishing that filing a chargesheet actually fortifies the prosecution's allegations rather than lessening them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 424/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge rejected the accused's second anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS, holding that the submission of a chargesheet does not constitute a change in circumstances warranting a fresh application after an earlier rejection on 23.09.2025. The court relied on the Supreme Court's judgment in Virupakshappa Gouda Vs. State of Karnataka, establishing that filing a chargesheet actually fortifies the prosecution's allegations rather than lessening them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case