STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs RAJIB PAL CHOWDHURY AND 3 ORS Advocate - OM PRAKASH RAM — 423/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBHW010011322026

Filing Number

663/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

423/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Howrah

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 20-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

247

Police Station

JAGATBALLAVPORE

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

    Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJIB PAL CHOWDHURY AND 3 ORS Advocate - OM PRAKASH RAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to four accused persons (Rajib Pal Chowdhury, Pradip Sana, Santi Pal, and Alok Bhatacharjee) on the ground of parity, as similar relief had already been granted to co-accused on identical charges under BNS sections 319(2), 336(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), and 61(2). The bail was granted subject to furnishing bonds of Rs. 5,000 each with sureties, making themselves available for police interrogation, and refraining from tampering with witnesses or evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 423/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to four accused persons (Rajib Pal Chowdhury, Pradip Sana, Santi Pal, and Alok Bhatacharjee) on the ground of parity, as similar relief had already been granted to co-accused on identical charges under BNS sections 319(2), 336(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), and 61(2). The bail was granted subject to furnishing bonds of Rs. 5,000 each with sureties, making themselves available for police interrogation, and refraining from tampering with witnesses or evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case