STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs SOMENATH GHOSH ALIAS SOMNATH GHOSH AND ANOTHER Advocate - SANJAY MUKHERJEE — 421/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBHW010011232026
Filing Number
660/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
421/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Howrah
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 20-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
31
Police Station
BOWRIA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE
Respondent(s)
-
1.SOMENATH GHOSH ALIAS SOMNATH GHOSH AND ANOTHER Advocate - SANJAY MUKHERJEE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Final OrderView PDF
Summary The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to both accused petitioners (Somenath Ghosh and Subham Ghosh) in a property dispute case involving allegations of assault and theft. The court found that the injuries sustained were not grave, there was unexplained delay in FIR filing, inconsistent weapon descriptions, and evidence of frivolous prosecution, warranting bail subject to conditions including furnishing bonds and fortnightly meetings with the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
General OrdersView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
General OrdersView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
General OrdersView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
District Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
General OrdersView PDF
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 421/2026
Summary The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to both accused petitioners (Somenath Ghosh and Subham Ghosh) in a property dispute case involving allegations of assault and theft. The court found that the injuries sustained were not grave, there was unexplained delay in FIR filing, inconsistent weapon descriptions, and evidence of frivolous prosecution, warranting bail subject to conditions including furnishing bonds and fortnightly meetings with the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts