STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs DIPANKAR SHOW ALIAS DIPANKAR SAU Advocate - TANMOY CHATTERJEE — 419/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.
1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBHW010011212026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
658/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
419/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Howrah
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
44
Police Station
JAGATBALLAVPORE
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE
Respondent(s)
DIPANKAR SHOW ALIAS DIPANKAR SAU Advocate - TANMOY CHATTERJEE
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Disposed
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition | |
| 25-02-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Howrah Sessions Court rejected the bail application of Dipankar Show, accused of rape and outraging modesty under BNS sections 64(2)(m) and 351(3). The court found the victim's statements credible, determined the sexual intercourse was non-consensual and exploited the victim's financial vulnerability, and concluded that granting bail would jeopardize the investigation into this heinous offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The Howrah Sessions Court rejected the bail application of Dipankar Show, accused of rape and outraging modesty under BNS sections 64(2)(m) and 351(3). The court found the victim's statements credible, determined the sexual intercourse was non-consensual and exploited the victim's financial vulnerability, and concluded that granting bail would jeopardize the investigation into this heinous offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts