STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs DIPANKAR SHOW ALIAS DIPANKAR SAU Advocate - TANMOY CHATTERJEE — 419/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBHW010011212026

Filing Number

658/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

419/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Howrah

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 20-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

JAGATBALLAVPORE

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

1.DIPANKAR SHOW ALIAS DIPANKAR SAU Advocate - TANMOY CHATTERJEE

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
12-Mar-2026

Final OrderView PDF

Summary: The Howrah Sessions Court rejected the bail application of Dipankar Show, accused of rape and outraging modesty under BNS sections 64(2)(m) and 351(3). The court found the victim's statements credible, determined the sexual intercourse was non-consensual and exploited the victim's financial vulnerability, and concluded that granting bail would jeopardize the investigation into this heinous offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
12-Mar-2026

Disposed

District Judge
09-Mar-2026

General OrdersView PDF
09-Mar-2026

Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

District Judge
25-Feb-2026

Final OrderView PDF
25-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
25-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 419/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Howrah Sessions Court rejected the bail application of Dipankar Show, accused of rape and outraging modesty under BNS sections 64(2)(m) and 351(3). The court found the victim's statements credible, determined the sexual intercourse was non-consensual and exploited the victim's financial vulnerability, and concluded that granting bail would jeopardize the investigation into this heinous offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.