STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs SK RAHUL ALI ALIAS SEKH RAHUL AMIN AND ANOTHER Advocate - SANJAY MUKHERJEE — 418/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBHW010011202026

Filing Number

657/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

418/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Howrah

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 20-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

55

Police Station

JAGATBALLAVPORE

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

    Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SK RAHUL ALI ALIAS SEKH RAHUL AMIN AND ANOTHER Advocate - SANJAY MUKHERJEE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to the two petitioners (parents of the primary accused) charged under sections 69/126(2)/117(2)/351(2) of the BNS, finding that the allegations against them were limited to assault during a verbal dispute with no evidence of grievous injury, while all grave offences were committed by their son. The bail was granted subject to conditions including furnishing a Rs. 3,000 bond each, availability for police interrogation, and prohibition on witness tampering or contact with the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 418/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to the two petitioners (parents of the primary accused) charged under sections 69/126(2)/117(2)/351(2) of the BNS, finding that the allegations against them were limited to assault during a verbal dispute with no evidence of grievous injury, while all grave offences were committed by their son. The bail was granted subject to conditions including furnishing a Rs. 3,000 bond each, availability for police interrogation, and prohibition on witness tampering or contact with the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case