STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs SOVAN MANDAL Advocate - ASHOK SAHA — 417/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBHW010011192026

Filing Number

656/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

417/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Howrah

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 20-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

59

Police Station

RAJAPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

    Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SOVAN MANDAL Advocate - ASHOK SAHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to accused Sovan Mandal in a case involving allegations under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 76, and 3(5). The court found that the allegations appeared exaggerated, the parties had settled their minor dispute, and the petitioner himself sustained grievous injuries, making physical custody unnecessary. With no criminal antecedents and considering established legal principles for anticipatory bail, the court approved the relief subject to conditions including a Rs. 3,000 bond with sureties and cooperation with police interrogation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 417/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to accused Sovan Mandal in a case involving allegations under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 76, and 3(5). The court found that the allegations appeared exaggerated, the parties had settled their minor dispute, and the petitioner himself sustained grievous injuries, making physical custody unnecessary. With no criminal antecedents and considering established legal principles for anticipatory bail, the court approved the relief subject to conditions including a Rs. 3,000 bond with sureties and cooperation with police interrogation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case