STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs SAIKAT MONDAL Advocate - ASHOK SAHA — 416/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--NOT PRESS on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBHW010011182026

Filing Number

655/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

416/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Howrah

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--NOT PRESS

Last updated 20-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

82

Police Station

SHYAMPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

    Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAIKAT MONDAL Advocate - ASHOK SAHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Howrah rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by accused Saikat Mondal under Section 482 BNSS in connection with Shyampur P.S. Case No. 82 of 2026 (involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 329(4), 117(2), 76, 303(2), 351(3), and 3(5)). The rejection was on the ground that the accused's counsel did not press the application during the hearing, resulting in its dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 416/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Howrah rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by accused Saikat Mondal under Section 482 BNSS in connection with Shyampur P.S. Case No. 82 of 2026 (involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 329(4), 117(2), 76, 303(2), 351(3), and 3(5)). The rejection was on the ground that the accused's counsel did not press the application during the hearing, resulting in its dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case