STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs BABU MOLLAH ALIAS JOYNAL ABEDIN MOLLAH Advocate - SUKAMAL KARAR — 415/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBHW010011162026

Filing Number

654/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

415/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Howrah

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 20-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

240

Police Station

DOMJUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

    Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BABU MOLLAH ALIAS JOYNAL ABEDIN MOLLAH Advocate - SUKAMAL KARAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    Summary The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to three of four accused persons (Babu Mollah, Rohit Sardar, and Saddam Sardar) in a case involving grievous injuries, finding that the investigation was complete and no fruitful purpose would be served by refusing relief. The court rejected the bail application for the second petitioner (Raj Sardar) as infructuous since no charge sheet had been filed against him, and imposed conditions including Rs. 3,000 bond, police interrogation availability, and surrender within 7 working days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 415/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to three of four accused persons (Babu Mollah, Rohit Sardar, and Saddam Sardar) in a case involving grievous injuries, finding that the investigation was complete and no fruitful purpose would be served by refusing relief. The court rejected the bail application for the second petitioner (Raj Sardar) as infructuous since no charge sheet had been filed against him, and imposed conditions including Rs. 3,000 bond, police interrogation availability, and surrender within 7 working days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case