STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs SK HASADUL ALIAS SK TAHIDUL ALI AND 3 ORS Advocate - SAMIR SAMANTA — 410/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBHW010010962026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
645/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
410/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Howrah
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
64
Police Station
SHYAMPUR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE
Respondent(s)
SK HASADUL ALIAS SK TAHIDUL ALI AND 3 ORS Advocate - SAMIR SAMANTA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Disposed
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-02-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to four accused persons in a case involving allegations under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(3), 76, 303, and 351(2). The court found that the complaint was filed with significant delay (nearly 8 months after the alleged incident on 29.06.2025), and noted the accused's counter-allegation that a prior FIR was lodged by a family member, suggesting possible frivolous prosecution and misuse of process. Bail was granted subject to conditions including a Rs. 5,000 bond with sureties, availability for police interrogation, non-interference with witnesses, and bi-weekly meetings with the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to four accused persons in a case involving allegations under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(3), 76, 303, and 351(2). The court found that the complaint was filed with significant delay (nearly 8 months after the alleged incident on 29.06.2025), and noted the accused's counter-allegation that a prior FIR was lodged by a family member, suggesting possible frivolous prosecution and misuse of process. Bail was granted subject to conditions including a Rs. 5,000 bond with sureties, availability for police interrogation, non-interference with witnesses, and bi-weekly meetings with the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts