STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs SK HASADUL ALIAS SK TAHIDUL ALI AND 3 ORS Advocate - SAMIR SAMANTA — 410/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBHW010010962026

Filing Number

645/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

410/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Howrah

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 20-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

64

Police Station

SHYAMPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

    Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SK HASADUL ALIAS SK TAHIDUL ALI AND 3 ORS Advocate - SAMIR SAMANTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to four accused persons in a case involving allegations under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(3), 76, 303, and 351(2). The court found that the complaint was filed with significant delay (nearly 8 months after the alleged incident on 29.06.2025), and noted the accused's counter-allegation that a prior FIR was lodged by a family member, suggesting possible frivolous prosecution and misuse of process. Bail was granted subject to conditions including a Rs. 5,000 bond with sureties, availability for police interrogation, non-interference with witnesses, and bi-weekly meetings with the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 410/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to four accused persons in a case involving allegations under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(3), 76, 303, and 351(2). The court found that the complaint was filed with significant delay (nearly 8 months after the alleged incident on 29.06.2025), and noted the accused's counter-allegation that a prior FIR was lodged by a family member, suggesting possible frivolous prosecution and misuse of process. Bail was granted subject to conditions including a Rs. 5,000 bond with sureties, availability for police interrogation, non-interference with witnesses, and bi-weekly meetings with the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case