STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs SUBHO MAKAL Advocate - SANJAY MUKHERJEE — 402/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBHW010010542026

Filing Number

625/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

402/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Howrah

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 03-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

533

Police Station

HOWRAH

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

    Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUBHO MAKAL Advocate - SANJAY MUKHERJEE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge granted bail to accused Subho Makal in a dacoity case, holding that detention during investigation should not be treated as punishment and that personal liberty is fundamental. The court released the accused on a bond of Rs. 2,000 with two sureties of Rs. 1,000 each, considering that he was arrested after the crime, co-accused had already been granted bail, and the investigation had stalled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    General OrdersView PDF

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 402/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge granted bail to accused Subho Makal in a dacoity case, holding that detention during investigation should not be treated as punishment and that personal liberty is fundamental. The court released the accused on a bond of Rs. 2,000 with two sureties of Rs. 1,000 each, considering that he was arrested after the crime, co-accused had already been granted bail, and the investigation had stalled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case