STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs SOBEDAR MIDDEY Advocate - SANGLAP MUKHERJEE — 313/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.
1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBHW010007772026
Filing Number
481/2026
Filing Date
10-Feb-2026
Registration No
313/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Howrah
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 20-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
286
Police Station
BAGNAN
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE
Respondent(s)
-
1.SOBEDAR MIDDEY Advocate - SANGLAP MUKHERJEE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Final OrderView PDF
Case Summary The Howrah Sessions Court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Sobedar Middey under Section 482 BNSS in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 399/402 and the Arms Act. The court held that the petitioner's involvement in multiple other criminal cases and the prior rejection of the same plea by the High Court, Calcutta, precluded grant of anticipatory bail, applying Supreme Court guidelines that require careful evaluation of accusation gravity, antecedents, and risk factors before granting such relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
General OrdersView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
District Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
District Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
General OrdersView PDF
-
10-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 313/2026
Case Summary The Howrah Sessions Court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Sobedar Middey under Section 482 BNSS in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 399/402 and the Arms Act. The court held that the petitioner's involvement in multiple other criminal cases and the prior rejection of the same plea by the High Court, Calcutta, precluded grant of anticipatory bail, applying Supreme Court guidelines that require careful evaluation of accusation gravity, antecedents, and risk factors before granting such relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts