STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs SK MAIDUL ALIAS SK VULON AND 6 ORS Advocate - SANGLAP MUKHERJEE — 304/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBHW010007532026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

467/2026

Filing Date

09-02-2026

Registration No

304/2026

Registration Date

09-02-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Howrah

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

07

Police Station

AMTA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

SK MAIDUL ALIAS SK VULON AND 6 ORS Advocate - SANGLAP MUKHERJEE

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge

09-03-2026

Disposed

25-02-2026

Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

17-02-2026

Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

09-02-2026

Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
FINAL ORDER

The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to seven accused persons in a case involving allegations of minor disputes over standing in line, finding that the facts had been exaggerated and the accusations lacked genuine merit. The court applied Supreme Court precedents requiring careful evaluation of the charges and balancing the need to prevent unjustified detention against investigative concerns. Bail was granted subject to furnishing bonds of Rs. 5,000 with sureties and conditions including availability for police interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to seven accused persons in a case involving allegations of minor disputes over standing in line, finding that the facts had been exaggerated and the accusations lacked genuine merit. The court applied Supreme Court precedents requiring careful evaluation of the charges and balancing the need to prevent unjustified detention against investigative concerns. Bail was granted subject to furnishing bonds of Rs. 5,000 with sureties and conditions including availability for police interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, Howrah All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case