STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs SK MAIDUL ALIAS SK VULON AND 6 ORS Advocate - SANGLAP MUKHERJEE — 304/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
1.Criminal Misc. - Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBHW010007532026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
467/2026
Filing Date
09-02-2026
Registration No
304/2026
Registration Date
09-02-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Howrah
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
07
Police Station
AMTA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Adv. SOMNATH BANERJEE
Respondent(s)
SK MAIDUL ALIAS SK VULON AND 6 ORS Advocate - SANGLAP MUKHERJEE
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Disposed
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-02-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition | |
| 17-02-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition | |
| 09-02-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to seven accused persons in a case involving allegations of minor disputes over standing in line, finding that the facts had been exaggerated and the accusations lacked genuine merit. The court applied Supreme Court precedents requiring careful evaluation of the charges and balancing the need to prevent unjustified detention against investigative concerns. Bail was granted subject to furnishing bonds of Rs. 5,000 with sureties and conditions including availability for police interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Howrah Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to seven accused persons in a case involving allegations of minor disputes over standing in line, finding that the facts had been exaggerated and the accusations lacked genuine merit. The court applied Supreme Court precedents requiring careful evaluation of the charges and balancing the need to prevent unjustified detention against investigative concerns. Bail was granted subject to furnishing bonds of Rs. 5,000 with sureties and conditions including availability for police interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts