PREETI BOSE ALIAS HALDER vs SUBAL HALDER — 266/2025

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 131iaib. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed of on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

Matrimonial Suit

CNR: WBHG090007722025

Filing Number

343/2025

Filing Date

17-Jun-2025

Registration No

266/2025

Registration Date

17-Jun-2025

Court

Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chandannagore, Hooghly

Judge

1-ADJ Ftc

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed of

Last updated 27-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 131iaib

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PREETI BOSE ALIAS HALDER

    Adv. ARNAB BHATTACHARJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUBAL HALDER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Additional District and Session Judge granted an ex-parte divorce decree to Preeti Bose against her husband Subal Haldar under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, based on grounds of cruelty and desertion. The court found that the respondent's mistreatment, dowry demands, physical assault, and complete abandonment for 12 years without maintenance—coupled with his failure to perform marital obligations—constituted actionable cruelty, and found no impediment to granting the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ Ftc

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Order

    ADJ Ftc

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Ex-parte Hearing

    ADJ Ftc

  6. 04-Feb-2026

    Ex-parte Hearing

    ADJ Ftc

  7. 30-Aug-2025

    Written Statement

    ADJ Ftc

  8. 30-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 17-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 266/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District and Session Judge granted an ex-parte divorce decree to Preeti Bose against her husband Subal Haldar under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, based on grounds of cruelty and desertion. The court found that the respondent's mistreatment, dowry demands, physical assault, and complete abandonment for 12 years without maintenance—coupled with his failure to perform marital obligations—constituted actionable cruelty, and found no impediment to granting the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case