BISWANATH GHOSH vs KAKOLI GHOSH — 8/2025

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 29. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Appeal

CNR: WBHG090004382025

Filing Number

256/2025

Filing Date

11-Apr-2025

Registration No

8/2025

Registration Date

11-Apr-2025

Court

Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chandannagore, Hooghly

Judge

1-ADJ Ftc

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 29

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BISWANATH GHOSH

    Adv. SAMOJIT MITRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAKOLI GHOSH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgementView PDF

    The West Bengal appellate court partially allowed the husband's appeal under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, modifying the trial court's maintenance order. The court upheld Rs. 8,000/month maintenance for the wife and a residence order, but struck down the Rs. 8,000/month for the adult son (who had attained majority and lacked documented disability), instead directing Rs. 2,000/month for alternative accommodation if needed, while maintaining the domestic violence prohibition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ Ftc

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Order

    ADJ Ftc

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Order

    ADJ Ftc

  6. 02-Feb-2026

    Appeal Hearing

    ADJ Ftc

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    Appeal Hearing

    ADJ Ftc

  8. 25-Nov-2025

    Appeal Hearing

    ADJ Ftc

  9. 14-Aug-2025

    Lcr

    ADJ Ftc

  10. 18-Jul-2025

    Lcr

    ADJ Ftc

  11. 12-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 11-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The West Bengal appellate court partially allowed the husband's appeal under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, modifying the trial court's maintenance order. The court upheld Rs. 8,000/month maintenance for the wife and a residence order, but struck down the Rs. 8,000/month for the adult son (who had attained majority and lacked documented disability), instead directing Rs. 2,000/month for alternative accommodation if needed, while maintaining the domestic violence prohibition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case