State of West Bengal vs JOYDEB GHOSH AND 3 ORS — 2/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,411,413,414. Status: Er of Wa / Wpa. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Er of Wa / Wpa Next hearing 17-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Sessions Case

CNR: WBHG090000532022

Filing Number

37/2022

Filing Date

17-Jan-2022

Registration No

2/2022

Registration Date

17-Jan-2022

Court

Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chandannagore, Hooghly

Judge

1-ADJ Ftc

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379,411,413,414

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JOYDEB GHOSH AND 3 ORS

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Er of Wa / Wpa

    ADJ Ftc

  3. 16-Dec-2025

    Er of Wa / Wpa

    ADJ Ftc

  4. 11-Apr-2025

    Framing of Charge

    ADJ Ftc

  5. 16-Dec-2024

    Framing of Charge

    ADJ Ftc

  6. 01-Apr-2024

    Framing of Charge

    ADJ Ftc

  7. 14-Sep-2023

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case SC 02/22 - Order No. 09 dated 14.09.23 The case is adjourned to 01.04.24 for appearance and consideration of charge. Three accused persons on court bail were present; however, accused Md. Saidul took no steps, and the surety is directed to produce him on the next date. The Public Prosecutor was appointed and filed appearance on behalf of the State. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 14-Sep-2023

    Framing of Charge

    ADJ Ftc

  9. 16-May-2023

    Appearance

    ADJ Ftc

  10. 24-Jan-2023

    Appearance

    ADJ Ftc

  11. 22-Aug-2022

    Appearance

    ADJ Ftc

  12. 27-Jul-2022

    Appearance

    ADJ

  13. 06-Jun-2022

    Appearance

    ADJ

  14. 28-Jan-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 17-Jan-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case SC 02/22 - Order No. 09 dated 14.09.23 The case is adjourned to 01.04.24 for appearance and consideration of charge. Three accused persons on court bail were present; however, accused Md. Saidul took no steps, and the surety is directed to produce him on the next date. The Public Prosecutor was appointed and filed appearance on behalf of the State. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case