Ashif Hossain Mallick. vs Dipankar Saha — 160/2019
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 138. Status: E.R.. Next hearing: 24th July 2026.
C R Case
CNR: WBHG060009312019
Filing Number
926/2019
Filing Date
29-May-2019
Registration No
160/2019
Registration Date
29-May-2019
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Serampore, Hooghly
Judge
8-Jm II
Last updated 02-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ashif Hossain Mallick.
Adv. Sk. Rafiqul Islam
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dipankar Saha
Case History
-
24-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
E.R.
Jm II
-
01-Nov-2025
E.R.
Jm II
-
12-Jun-2025
E.R.
Jm II
-
23-Oct-2024
E.R.
Jm II
-
04-Jun-2024
E.R.
Jm II
-
04-Nov-2023
E.R.
Jm II
-
17-Jun-2023
Evidence
Jm II
-
21-Jan-2023
Evidence
Jm II
-
14-Oct-2022
Evidence
Jm II
-
21-Jul-2022
Evidence
Jm II
-
19-May-2022
Evidence
Jm II
-
16-Mar-2022
copy of orderView PDF
Summary: The petition filed by the complainant under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act was allowed. The court directed the accused to pay interim compensation of 10% of the impugned cheque amount to the complainant within 60 days from the date of the order. The case is adjourned to 19.05.2022 for examination of prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2022
Evidence
Jm II
-
29-Dec-2021
Hearing
Jm II
-
23-Sep-2021
Hearing
Jm II
-
22-Jun-2021
Hearing
Jm II
-
06-Apr-2021
Hearing
Jm II
-
08-Jan-2021
Hearing
Jm II
-
05-Oct-2020
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Jm II
-
27-Mar-2020
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Jm II
-
17-Jan-2020
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Jm II
-
20-Sep-2019
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Jm II
-
29-May-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-May-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 160/2019
Summary: The petition filed by the complainant under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act was allowed. The court directed the accused to pay interim compensation of 10% of the impugned cheque amount to the complainant within 60 days from the date of the order. The case is adjourned to 19.05.2022 for examination of prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts