Bajaj Housing Finance Limited. (Authorised Officer Mr. Kunal Shah). vs Pankaj Agarwal, Manju Agarwal and Punit Agarwal. — 61/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
M C Case
CNR: WBHG060006362026
Filing Number
636/2026
Filing Date
10-Feb-2026
Registration No
61/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Serampore, Hooghly
Judge
7-Acjm
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bajaj Housing Finance Limited. (Authorised Officer Mr. Kunal Shah).
Adv. Arup Sarkar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pankaj Agarwal, Manju Agarwal and Punit Agarwal.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
copy of orderView PDF
Case Summary: Bajaj Housing Finance Limited v. Pankaj Agarwal & Others (MC Case No. 61/2026) The court granted Bajaj Housing Finance Limited's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 to take possession of a mortgaged property in Rishra, Hooghly after the borrowers defaulted on a home loan of Rs. 29,51,517/- plus topup facility of Rs. 8,08,683/-. The court found that the petitioner had complied with all statutory requirements including Sections 13(2) and 13(4 notices and newspaper publications. The court appointed an Advocate Commissioner to execute possession after providing 14 days' notice to borrowers, with police assistance if needed. Borrowers may challenge this order by filing objections before the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Acjm
-
10-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 61/2026
Case Summary: Bajaj Housing Finance Limited v. Pankaj Agarwal & Others (MC Case No. 61/2026) The court granted Bajaj Housing Finance Limited's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 to take possession of a mortgaged property in Rishra, Hooghly after the borrowers defaulted on a home loan of Rs. 29,51,517/- plus topup facility of Rs. 8,08,683/-. The court found that the petitioner had complied with all statutory requirements including Sections 13(2) and 13(4 notices and newspaper publications. The court appointed an Advocate Commissioner to execute possession after providing 14 days' notice to borrowers, with police assistance if needed. Borrowers may challenge this order by filing objections before the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts