Sri Somnath Mukhopadhyay vs Sri Tapan Kumar Roy and others — 205/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 09. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 23rd September 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 23-Sep-2026 in 7 weeks

Title Appeal

CNR: WBHG050023832015

Filing Number

1317/2015

Filing Date

08-Sep-2015

Registration No

205/2015

Registration Date

08-Sep-2015

Court

Additional District Judge, Serampore, Hooghly

Judge

2-ADJ Ftc

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 09

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sri Somnath Mukhopadhyay

    Adv. Krishna Shankar Belel

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sri Tapan Kumar Roy and others

Case History

  1. 23-Sep-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-May-2026

    Hearing

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl District and Sessions Judge Ftc

  4. 03-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Addl District and Sessions Judge Ftc

  5. 27-Aug-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The court allowed the respondent's petition for condonation of delay in filing cross-objection under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, despite the eight-year delay from 2015 to 2023. However, as a condition precedent and to compensate the appellant, the respondent was directed to pay Rs. 2,000 in costs (50% to D.L.S.A., Serampore and 50% to the appellant) by December 3, 2025, failing which the relief shall stand recalled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 27-Aug-2025

    Order

    Addl District and Sessions Judge Ftc

  7. 13-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ Ftc

  8. 01-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    ADJ Ftc

  9. 19-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    ADJ Ftc

  10. 29-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ Ftc

  11. 20-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ Ftc

  12. 08-May-2023

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  13. 08-May-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ Ftc

  14. 13-Jan-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ Ftc

  15. 16-Aug-2022

    Hearing

    ADJ Ftc

  16. 21-Jun-2022

    Show Cause

    ADJ Ftc

  17. 25-Mar-2022

    Show Cause

    ADJ Ftc

  18. 10-Jan-2022

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ Ftc

  19. 08-Nov-2021

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ Ftc

  20. 18-Aug-2021

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ Ftc

  21. 07-Jul-2021

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ Ftc

  22. 29-Apr-2021

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ Ftc

  23. 09-Mar-2021

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ Ftc

  24. 06-Feb-2021

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ Ftc

  25. 26-Nov-2020

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ Ftc

  26. 24-Aug-2020

    Hearing of Petition

  27. 23-Apr-2020

    Hearing of Petition

  28. 20-Mar-2020

    Hearing of Petition

    Addl District and Sessions Judge Ftc

  29. 07-Feb-2020

    Hearing of Petition

    Addl District and Sessions Judge Ftc

  30. 07-Dec-2019

    Hearing

    Addl District and Sessions Judge Ftc

  31. 11-Nov-2019

    Hearing

    Addl District and Sessions Judge Ftc

  32. 14-Aug-2019

    Hearing

    Addl District and Sessions Judge Ftc

  33. 14-Jun-2019

    Hearing

    Addl District and Sessions Judge Ftc

  34. 10-May-2019

    Hearing

    Addl District and Sessions Judge Ftc

  35. 11-Mar-2019

    Hearing

    Addl District and Sessions Judge Ftc

  36. 15-Jan-2019

    Hearing

    ADJ Ftc

  37. 14-Nov-2018

    Hearing

    ADJ Ftc

  38. 10-Aug-2018

    Lcr

    ADJ Ftc

  39. 16-Jun-2018

    Lcr

    ADJ Ftc

  40. 02-May-2018

    Lcr

    ADJ Ftc

  41. 27-Mar-2018

    Lcr

    ADJ Ftc

  42. 06-Feb-2018

    Lcr

    ADJ Ftc

  43. 17-Nov-2017

    Lcr

    ADJ Ftc

  44. 04-Aug-2017

    Lcr

    ADJ Ftc

  45. 28-Apr-2017

    Restored

    ADJ Ftc

  46. 28-Apr-2017

    Disposed

    ADJ Ftc

  47. 28-Mar-2017

    Lcr

    ADJ I

  48. 23-Dec-2016

    Lcr

    ADJ I

  49. 03-Sep-2016

    ADJ I

  50. 13-Jun-2016

    ADJ I

  51. 21-Jan-2016

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ I

  52. 05-Oct-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  53. 08-Sep-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 205/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the respondent's petition for condonation of delay in filing cross-objection under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, despite the eight-year delay from 2015 to 2023. However, as a condition precedent and to compensate the appellant, the respondent was directed to pay Rs. 2,000 in costs (50% to D.L.S.A., Serampore and 50% to the appellant) by December 3, 2025, failing which the relief shall stand recalled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case