Sri Ram Krishna Chatterjee vs Sri Joydeb Patro — 84/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 8. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED ON CONTEST on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Title Appeal

CNR: WBHG050020892024

Filing Number

1361/2024

Filing Date

21-Nov-2024

Registration No

84/2024

Registration Date

21-Nov-2024

Court

Additional District Judge, Serampore, Hooghly

Judge

2-Addl District and Sessions Judge Ftc

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED ON CONTEST

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 8

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sri Ram Krishna Chatterjee

    Adv. Pinaki Prasad Banerjee

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sri Joydeb Patro

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Title Appeal No. 84/2024 Court Decision: The Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Serampore allowed the appellant's appeal and granted an eviction decree. The court set aside the trial court's dismissal, holding that the eviction notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act was validly served on the tenant via registered post, evidenced by postal authority records. The respondent tenant is directed to vacate the shop room within one month. Key Reasoning: The trial court had dismissed the suit for lack of valid notice service, but the appellate court found that postal records (Exhibits 4 and 4(a)) proved delivery of the notice on 15.12.2023. The carbon copy of the typed notice bearing the lawyer's original signature was accepted as valid secondary evidence under Indian Evidence Act Section 63, following Supreme Court precedents establishing that proper service via registered post creates a presumption of valid delivery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl District and Sessions Judge Ftc

  4. 29-Jan-2026

    Order

    Addl District and Sessions Judge Ftc

  5. 13-Jan-2026

    Order

    Addl District and Sessions Judge Ftc

  6. 28-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Addl District and Sessions Judge Ftc

  7. 24-Sep-2025

    Order

    Addl District and Sessions Judge Ftc

  8. 25-Jul-2025

    Order

    Addl District and Sessions Judge Ftc

  9. 12-Jun-2025

    Order

    ADJ Ftc

  10. 21-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ Ftc

  11. 21-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 21-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 84/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Title Appeal No. 84/2024 Court Decision: The Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Serampore allowed the appellant's appeal and granted an eviction decree. The court set aside the trial court's dismissal, holding that the eviction notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act was validly served on the tenant via registered post, evidenced by postal authority records. The respondent tenant is directed to vacate the shop room within one month. Key Reasoning: The trial court had dismissed the suit for lack of valid notice service, but the appellate court found that postal records (Exhibits 4 and 4(a)) proved delivery of the notice on 15.12.2023. The carbon copy of the typed notice bearing the lawyer's original signature was accepted as valid secondary evidence under Indian Evidence Act Section 63, following Supreme Court precedents establishing that proper service via registered post creates a presumption of valid delivery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case