Sonali Manna vs Pradip Saha — 702/2025

Case under Special Marriage Act Section 28. Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed on consent without cost on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

Matrimonial Suit

CNR: WBHG050016382025

Filing Number

1218/2025

Filing Date

10-Sep-2025

Registration No

702/2025

Registration Date

10-Sep-2025

Court

Additional District Judge, Serampore, Hooghly

Judge

1-Addl District and Sessions Judge II

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Decreed on consent without cost

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Special Marriage Act Section 28

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sonali Manna

    Adv. Argha Kundu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pradip Saha

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court granted the joint application for divorce filed by Sonali Manna and Pradip Saha under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The parties, married on 29.01.2020, had been living separately since 23.01.2024 (over one year) and voluntarily consented to dissolution. The court found all statutory requirements met, including jurisdictional compliance and the mandatory six-month waiting period, and found no legal impediment or collusion, thereby dissolving the marriage with immediate effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl District and Sessions Judge II

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl District and Sessions Judge II

  6. 10-Sep-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  7. 10-Sep-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  8. 10-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 10-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 702/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the joint application for divorce filed by Sonali Manna and Pradip Saha under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The parties, married on 29.01.2020, had been living separately since 23.01.2024 (over one year) and voluntarily consented to dissolution. The court found all statutory requirements met, including jurisdictional compliance and the mandatory six-month waiting period, and found no legal impediment or collusion, thereby dissolving the marriage with immediate effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case