Smt. Rakhi Yadav (Das) vs Sri Mintu Kumar Das — 683/2025

Case under Special Marriage Act Section 28. Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed on consent without cost on 28th April 2026.

Case disposed

Matrimonial Suit

CNR: WBHG050015922025

Filing Number

1185/2025

Filing Date

03-Sep-2025

Registration No

683/2025

Registration Date

03-Sep-2025

Court

Additional District Judge, Serampore, Hooghly

Judge

1-Addl District and Sessions Judge II

Decision Date

28-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Decreed on consent without cost

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Special Marriage Act Section 28

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Rakhi Yadav (Das)

    Adv. Snigdha Talukdar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sri Mintu Kumar Das

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The court granted a decree of divorce dissolving the marriage between Smt. Rakhi Yadav (Das) and Sri Mintu Kumar Das on mutual consent under Section 28(2) of the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The parties were married on 26.5.2020, lived separately since 10.5.2024 (over one year), and jointly applied for dissolution with both testifying on oath. The court found all statutory requirements satisfied, no collusion, and no legal impediment to granting the relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl District and Sessions Judge II

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl District and Sessions Judge II

  6. 03-Sep-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  7. 03-Sep-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  8. 03-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 03-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 683/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted a decree of divorce dissolving the marriage between Smt. Rakhi Yadav (Das) and Sri Mintu Kumar Das on mutual consent under Section 28(2) of the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The parties were married on 26.5.2020, lived separately since 10.5.2024 (over one year), and jointly applied for dissolution with both testifying on oath. The court found all statutory requirements satisfied, no collusion, and no legal impediment to granting the relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case