Kajal Singh vs Debasish Halder — 682/2025
Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13B. Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed on consent without cost on 27th April 2026.
Matrimonial Suit
CNR: WBHG050015892025
Filing Number
1184/2025
Filing Date
03-Sep-2025
Registration No
682/2025
Registration Date
03-Sep-2025
Court
Additional District Judge, Serampore, Hooghly
Judge
1-Addl District and Sessions Judge II
Decision Date
27-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Decreed on consent without cost
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kajal Singh
Adv. Sanjoy Das
Respondent(s)
-
1.Debasish Halder
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The court granted a decree of divorce dissolving the marriage between Kajal Singh and Debasish Halder under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, on mutual consent. The parties, who married on 18.4.2024, had separated on 20.6.2024 and filed a joint application after the statutory one-year waiting period. The court found no legal impediment, confirmed both parties' voluntary agreement to dissolve the marriage, and established jurisdiction as the parties last resided together within the court's territorial jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
03-Sep-2025
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
03-Sep-2025
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
03-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 682/2025
The court granted a decree of divorce dissolving the marriage between Kajal Singh and Debasish Halder under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, on mutual consent. The parties, who married on 18.4.2024, had separated on 20.6.2024 and filed a joint application after the statutory one-year waiting period. The court found no legal impediment, confirmed both parties' voluntary agreement to dissolve the marriage, and established jurisdiction as the parties last resided together within the court's territorial jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts