Puja Garg vs Shekhar Agarwal alias Amit Agarwal — 583/2024
Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13(1)(ia). Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EXPARTE against the RESPONDENT on 01st June 2026.
Matrimonial Suit
CNR: WBHG050014512024
Filing Number
939/2024
Filing Date
03-Aug-2024
Registration No
583/2024
Registration Date
03-Aug-2024
Court
Additional District Judge, Serampore, Hooghly
Judge
2-ADJ Ftc
Decision Date
01-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED EXPARTE against the RESPONDENT
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Puja Garg
Adv. Gopal Krishna Thakur
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shekhar Agarwal alias Amit Agarwal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Jun-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The Fast Track Court granted Puja Garg's divorce petition against her husband Shekhar Agarwal under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act. The court found her allegations of physical and mental torture, dowry harassment, and forced departure from the matrimonial home in December 2022 credible and unchallenged, as the respondent failed to appear despite service of summons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Jun-2026
Disposed
ADJ Ftc
-
16-Mar-2026
Order
Addl District and Sessions Judge Ftc
-
31-Jan-2026
Order
Addl District and Sessions Judge Ftc
-
23-Sep-2025
Order
Addl District and Sessions Judge Ftc
-
18-Jul-2025
Argument / Further Argument
Addl District and Sessions Judge Ftc
-
03-Jun-2025
Evidence
ADJ Ftc
-
27-Mar-2025
Evidence
ADJ Ftc
-
17-Feb-2025
Exparte Hearing
ADJ Ftc
-
15-Jan-2025
Exparte Hearing
ADJ Ftc
-
19-Sep-2024
Sr/Ad/Appearence
ADJ Ftc
-
03-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 583/2024
The Fast Track Court granted Puja Garg's divorce petition against her husband Shekhar Agarwal under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act. The court found her allegations of physical and mental torture, dowry harassment, and forced departure from the matrimonial home in December 2022 credible and unchallenged, as the respondent failed to appear despite service of summons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts