Sri Gautam Kumar Ghosh vs Sri Swapan Pan, The State of West Bengal — 77/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438, 440. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.

Criminal Revision

CNR: WBHG050014152025

Case disposed

Filing Number

594/2025

Filing Date

02-08-2025

Registration No

77/2025

Registration Date

02-08-2025

Court

Additional District Judge, Serampore, Hooghly

Judge

1-Addl District and Sessions Judge II

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438, 440

Petitioner(s)

Sri Gautam Kumar Ghosh

Adv. Sneha Chattopadhyay

Respondent(s)

Sri Swapan Pan, The State of West Bengal

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Addl District and Sessions Judge II

06-05-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Order

11-12-2025

LCR

28-10-2025

Show Cause

25-08-2025

Show Cause

Final Orders / Judgements

06-05-2026
Copy of Order

Summary The court dismissed Criminal Motion 77 of 2025 without contest, holding that the revisionist's challenge to the Executive Magistrate's order dated 16.7.2025 had become infructuous. The court found that under Section 163(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the impugned order was valid only for two months (until 15.9.2025), and since no state government notification extended it further, the order had already expired by the time of this revision petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

04-08-2025
Copy of Order
25-08-2025
Copy of Order
28-10-2025
Copy of Order
11-12-2025
Copy of Order
12-03-2026
Copy of Order
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court dismissed Criminal Motion 77 of 2025 without contest, holding that the revisionist's challenge to the Executive Magistrate's order dated 16.7.2025 had become infructuous. The court found that under Section 163(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the impugned order was valid only for two months (until 15.9.2025), and since no state government notification extended it further, the order had already expired by the time of this revision petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional District Judge, Serampore, Hooghly All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case