Sri Gautam Kumar Ghosh vs Sri Swapan Pan, The State of West Bengal — 77/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438, 440. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.
Criminal Revision
CNR: WBHG050014152025
Filing Number
594/2025
Filing Date
02-Aug-2025
Registration No
77/2025
Registration Date
02-Aug-2025
Court
Additional District Judge, Serampore, Hooghly
Judge
1-Addl District and Sessions Judge II
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sri Gautam Kumar Ghosh
Adv. Sneha Chattopadhyay
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sri Swapan Pan, The State of West Bengal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary The court dismissed Criminal Motion 77 of 2025 without contest, holding that the revisionist's challenge to the Executive Magistrate's order dated 16.7.2025 had become infructuous. The court found that under Section 163(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the impugned order was valid only for two months (until 15.9.2025), and since no state government notification extended it further, the order had already expired by the time of this revision petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Disposed
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Order
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
11-Dec-2025
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
11-Dec-2025
Lcr
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
28-Oct-2025
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
28-Oct-2025
Show Cause
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
25-Aug-2025
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
25-Aug-2025
Show Cause
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
04-Aug-2025
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
04-Aug-2025
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
02-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 77/2025
Summary The court dismissed Criminal Motion 77 of 2025 without contest, holding that the revisionist's challenge to the Executive Magistrate's order dated 16.7.2025 had become infructuous. The court found that under Section 163(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the impugned order was valid only for two months (until 15.9.2025), and since no state government notification extended it further, the order had already expired by the time of this revision petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts