Smt. Angana Malik vs Sri Soumyajyoti Mullick, Sri Baladeb Mullick and others — 32/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397, 399. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.

Criminal Revision

CNR: WBHG050006072025

Case disposed

Filing Number

257/2025

Filing Date

05-04-2025

Registration No

32/2025

Registration Date

05-04-2025

Court

Additional District Judge, Serampore, Hooghly

Judge

1-Addl District and Sessions Judge II

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Section 397, 399

Petitioner(s)

Smt. Angana Malik

Adv. Partha Sarathi Sain

Respondent(s)

Sri Soumyajyoti Mullick, Sri Baladeb Mullick and others

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Addl District and Sessions Judge II

04-05-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Order

15-12-2025

LCR

22-09-2025

LCR

08-08-2025

Show Cause

Final Orders / Judgements

04-05-2026
Copy of Order

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed Criminal Motion 32 of 2025, holding that the revision petition had become infructuous as the underlying trial had already concluded with an acquittal judgment on 10.10.2025. The court reasoned that once a trial concludes and judgment is delivered, the trial court becomes functus officio, and Section 173(8) CrPC cannot be invoked to reopen concluded trials or circumvent acquittal judgments, rendering no effective relief available. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

02-06-2025
Copy of Order
08-08-2025
Copy of Order
22-09-2025
Copy of Order
15-12-2025
Copy of Order
12-03-2026
Copy of Order
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed Criminal Motion 32 of 2025, holding that the revision petition had become infructuous as the underlying trial had already concluded with an acquittal judgment on 10.10.2025. The court reasoned that once a trial concludes and judgment is delivered, the trial court becomes functus officio, and Section 173(8) CrPC cannot be invoked to reopen concluded trials or circumvent acquittal judgments, rendering no effective relief available. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional District Judge, Serampore, Hooghly All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case