Pankaj Poria vs State of West Bengal — 60/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397, 399. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED ON CONTEST on 12th March 2026.
Criminal Revision
CNR: WBHG050005212024
Filing Number
257/2024
Filing Date
19-03-2024
Registration No
60/2024
Registration Date
19-03-2024
Court
Additional District Judge, Serampore, Hooghly
Judge
2-Addl District and Sessions Judge FTC
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED ON CONTEST
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pankaj Poria
Adv. Debdatta Bhattacharya
Respondent(s)
State of West Bengal
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl District and Sessions Judge FTC
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-01-2026 | Hearing |
| 29-11-2025 | Hearing |
| 10-11-2025 | Hearing |
| 20-06-2025 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Criminal Revision No. 60/2024 The Additional Sessions Judge set aside a Warrant of Arrest (PWA) issued against Pankaj Poria on 28.06.2023, finding procedural irregularities in the trial court record. Although the court acknowledged that the ACJM had authority under Section 87 CrPC to issue a warrant directly, it found that Poria had validly obtained bail on 20.12.2019 from the higher court, which should have been reflected in the lower court's records before issuing the PWA. The court directed Poria to appear before the ACJM within 30 days for fresh consideration of his case as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Criminal Revision No. 60/2024 The Additional Sessions Judge set aside a Warrant of Arrest (PWA) issued against Pankaj Poria on 28.06.2023, finding procedural irregularities in the trial court record. Although the court acknowledged that the ACJM had authority under Section 87 CrPC to issue a warrant directly, it found that Poria had validly obtained bail on 20.12.2019 from the higher court, which should have been reflected in the lower court's records before issuing the PWA. The court directed Poria to appear before the ACJM within 30 days for fresh consideration of his case as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts