Pankaj Poria vs State of West Bengal — 60/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397, 399. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED ON CONTEST on 12th March 2026.

Criminal Revision

CNR: WBHG050005212024

Case disposed

Filing Number

257/2024

Filing Date

19-03-2024

Registration No

60/2024

Registration Date

19-03-2024

Court

Additional District Judge, Serampore, Hooghly

Judge

2-Addl District and Sessions Judge FTC

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED ON CONTEST

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Section 397, 399

Petitioner(s)

Pankaj Poria

Adv. Debdatta Bhattacharya

Respondent(s)

State of West Bengal

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Addl District and Sessions Judge FTC

12-03-2026

Disposed

19-01-2026

Hearing

29-11-2025

Hearing

10-11-2025

Hearing

20-06-2025

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary of Criminal Revision No. 60/2024 The Additional Sessions Judge set aside a Warrant of Arrest (PWA) issued against Pankaj Poria on 28.06.2023, finding procedural irregularities in the trial court record. Although the court acknowledged that the ACJM had authority under Section 87 CrPC to issue a warrant directly, it found that Poria had validly obtained bail on 20.12.2019 from the higher court, which should have been reflected in the lower court's records before issuing the PWA. The court directed Poria to appear before the ACJM within 30 days for fresh consideration of his case as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

20-03-2024
Copy of Order
14-08-2024
Copy of Order
casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Criminal Revision No. 60/2024 The Additional Sessions Judge set aside a Warrant of Arrest (PWA) issued against Pankaj Poria on 28.06.2023, finding procedural irregularities in the trial court record. Although the court acknowledged that the ACJM had authority under Section 87 CrPC to issue a warrant directly, it found that Poria had validly obtained bail on 20.12.2019 from the higher court, which should have been reflected in the lower court's records before issuing the PWA. The court directed Poria to appear before the ACJM within 30 days for fresh consideration of his case as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional District Judge, Serampore, Hooghly All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case