Sumita Biswas vs Jaharlal Tudu and 3 others — 156/2015

Case under Administrators Section 151. Status: Lcr. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.

Lcr Next hearing 19-May-2026 this date has passed

Title Appeal

CNR: WBHG010066732015

Filing Number

2160/2015

Filing Date

22-Dec-2015

Registration No

156/2015

Registration Date

22-Dec-2015

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Hooghly

Judge

1-District Judge

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Administrators Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sumita Biswas

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jaharlal Tudu and 3 others

Case History

  1. 19-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Lcr

    District Judge

  3. 17-Dec-2025

    Lcr

    District Judge

  4. 03-Dec-2025

    Lcr

    District Judge

  5. 03-Sep-2025

    Lcr

    District Judge

  6. 19-Jul-2025

    Steps

    District Judge

  7. 25-Jun-2025

    Awaiting Report

    District Judge

  8. 15-May-2025

    Hearing of Petition

    District Judge

  9. 21-Mar-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: In Title Appeal Case No. 156 of 2015, the District Judge of Hooghly adjourned the case to 15.05.2025 for hearing of the appellant's petition under Order 5 Rule 20 of CPC. The court directed the appellant to take proper steps for substitute service of notice on Respondent No. 4. The appellant appeared through counsel and filed the petition supported by an affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 21-Mar-2025

    Hearing of Petition

    District Judge

  11. 18-Dec-2024

    Steps

    District Judge

  12. 18-Sep-2024

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  13. 05-Jul-2024

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  14. 30-Apr-2024

    Show Cause

    District Judge

  15. 17-Jan-2024

    Show Cause

    District Judge

  16. 20-Sep-2023

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  17. 12-Jun-2023

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  18. 03-Mar-2023

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  19. 05-Dec-2022

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  20. 26-Aug-2022

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  21. 02-Jun-2022

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  22. 18-Feb-2022

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  23. 09-Dec-2021

    Steps

    District Judge

  24. 25-Aug-2021

    Steps

    District Judge

  25. 06-May-2021

    Steps

    District Judge

  26. 01-Mar-2021

    Steps

    District Judge

  27. 11-Jan-2021

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  28. 12-Oct-2020

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  29. 25-Mar-2020

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  30. 20-Feb-2020

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  31. 16-Jan-2020

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  32. 30-Nov-2019

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  33. 11-Sep-2019

    Steps

    District Judge

  34. 15-Jul-2019

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  35. 17-May-2019

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  36. 25-Mar-2019

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  37. 05-Feb-2019

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  38. 22-Nov-2018

    Steps

    District Judge

  39. 03-Aug-2018

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  40. 02-May-2018

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  41. 31-Jan-2018

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  42. 14-Nov-2017

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  43. 25-Jul-2017

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  44. 26-May-2017

    Steps

    District Judge

  45. 19-Jan-2017

    Steps

    District Judge

  46. 16-Sep-2016

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  47. 10-Aug-2016

    Steps

    District Judge

  48. 05-May-2016

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ I

  49. 22-Dec-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  50. 22-Dec-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 156/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Title Appeal Case No. 156 of 2015, the District Judge of Hooghly adjourned the case to 15.05.2025 for hearing of the appellant's petition under Order 5 Rule 20 of CPC. The court directed the appellant to take proper steps for substitute service of notice on Respondent No. 4. The appellant appeared through counsel and filed the petition supported by an affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case