Arindam Ghosh vs Abbasuddin Sarkar — 83/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section none. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.
Title Appeal
CNR: WBHG010036182025
Filing Number
1656/2025
Filing Date
08-Sep-2025
Registration No
83/2025
Registration Date
08-Sep-2025
Court
Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Hooghly
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Arindam Ghosh
Adv. SANTANU GHOSAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.Abbasuddin Sarkar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Copy of JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: Title Appeal 83/2025 The District Judge dismissed defendant Arindam Ghosh's appeal against an eviction decree, upholding the trial court's decision that he must vacate the suit property (a ground-floor shop room) owned by plaintiff Abbasuddin Sarkar. The court confirmed the landlord-tenant relationship and validity of the eviction notice dated 28 May 2018, rejecting the defendant's claims of perpetual tenancy and non-joinder of his brother. However, the appellate court modified the judgment to award the plaintiff a preliminary decree for mesne profits (pending inquiry), removing the trial court's erroneous adjustment against alleged advance payments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
24-Apr-2026
Judgement
District Judge
-
22-Apr-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
10-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
Hearing
District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Lcr
District Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
Lcr
District Judge
-
08-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 83/2025
Case Summary: Title Appeal 83/2025 The District Judge dismissed defendant Arindam Ghosh's appeal against an eviction decree, upholding the trial court's decision that he must vacate the suit property (a ground-floor shop room) owned by plaintiff Abbasuddin Sarkar. The court confirmed the landlord-tenant relationship and validity of the eviction notice dated 28 May 2018, rejecting the defendant's claims of perpetual tenancy and non-joinder of his brother. However, the appellate court modified the judgment to award the plaintiff a preliminary decree for mesne profits (pending inquiry), removing the trial court's erroneous adjustment against alleged advance payments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts