Surajit Nandi vs Susoma Nandi — 237/2023
Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 9. Status: P.H. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
Matrimonial Suit
CNR: WBHG010029722023
Filing Number
1286/2023
Filing Date
24-Jul-2023
Registration No
237/2023
Registration Date
24-Jul-2023
Court
Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Hooghly
Judge
4-ADJ III
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Surajit Nandi
Adv. Narayan Bhadra
Respondent(s)
-
1.Susoma Nandi
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Mar-2026
P.H
ADJ III
-
21-Jan-2026
P.H
ADJ III
-
25-Sep-2025
P.H
ADJ III
-
25-Jun-2025
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary: In Mat Suit 237/2023 (Hooghly District Court), the court allowed the respondent/O.P's petition to set aside the ex-parte order and permitted her to contest the suit by accepting her written statement filed through new counsel. The court found no intention or laches on her part, attributing the delay to miscommunication with her previous advocate. The matter is adjourned to 25.09.2025 for framing of issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Jun-2025
Issues
ADJ III
-
29-Apr-2025
Order
ADJ III
-
11-Mar-2025
Copy of Order
-
11-Mar-2025
Argument / Further Argument
ADJ III
-
06-Feb-2025
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
06-Feb-2025
Argument / Further Argument
ADJ III
-
28-Nov-2024
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
28-Nov-2024
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
28-Nov-2024
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
28-Nov-2024
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
28-Nov-2024
Exparte Hearing
ADJ III
-
14-Aug-2024
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
14-Aug-2024
Exparte Hearing
ADJ III
-
25-Apr-2024
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
25-Apr-2024
Exparte Hearing
ADJ III
-
16-Jan-2024
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
16-Jan-2024
Written Statement
ADJ III
-
06-Dec-2023
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
24-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 237/2023
Summary: In Mat Suit 237/2023 (Hooghly District Court), the court allowed the respondent/O.P's petition to set aside the ex-parte order and permitted her to contest the suit by accepting her written statement filed through new counsel. The court found no intention or laches on her part, attributing the delay to miscommunication with her previous advocate. The matter is adjourned to 25.09.2025 for framing of issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts