Ratan Dey and Another vs Minor Niladri Dey represented by Sri Nanigopal Dey — 88/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

Misc. Appeal

CNR: WBHG010026862025

Filing Number

1239/2025

Filing Date

10-Jul-2025

Registration No

88/2025

Registration Date

10-Jul-2025

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Hooghly

Judge

2-ADJ I

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ratan Dey and Another

    Adv. Biswajit Poddar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Minor Niladri Dey represented by Sri Nanigopal Dey

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgementView PDF

    Summary The Additional District Judge, Chinsurah allowed the defendants' appeal and modified the lower court's temporary injunction order. The court found that the plaintiff failed to come before it with clean hands by suppressing material facts regarding a pending probate proceeding and competing claims over the disputed property. Instead of the plaintiff-specific injunction, the court directed both parties to maintain status quo regarding possession and character of the property until final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    ADJ I

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    ADJ I

  7. 17-Nov-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  8. 17-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ I

  9. 19-Jul-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ I

  10. 10-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 10-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 88/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional District Judge, Chinsurah allowed the defendants' appeal and modified the lower court's temporary injunction order. The court found that the plaintiff failed to come before it with clean hands by suppressing material facts regarding a pending probate proceeding and competing claims over the disputed property. Instead of the plaintiff-specific injunction, the court directed both parties to maintain status quo regarding possession and character of the property until final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case