Mrinal Kanti Ghosh vs Kamal Molla — 1332/2014
Status: Sr/Ad/Appearence. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
M A C C - M.A.C.C
CNR: WBHG010012142013
Filing Number
19238/2014
Filing Date
09-Sep-2013
Registration No
1332/2014
Registration Date
09-Sep-2013
Court
Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Hooghly
Judge
4-ADJ III
Last updated 02-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mrinal Kanti Ghosh
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kamal Molla
Case History
-
05-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Sr/Ad/Appearence
ADJ III
-
17-Dec-2025
Sr/Ad/Appearence
ADJ III
-
11-Sep-2025
DC Fees
District Judge
-
16-Jun-2025
DC Fees
District Judge
-
12-Mar-2025
DC Fees
District Judge
-
06-Dec-2024
DC Fees
District Judge
-
19-Aug-2024
DC Fees
District Judge
-
10-May-2024
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
12-Feb-2024
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
20-Dec-2023
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
04-Oct-2023
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
19-Jun-2023
Steps
District Judge
-
21-Feb-2023
Steps
District Judge
-
02-Feb-2023
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary: The District Judge of Hooghly allowed the amendment petition dated 21.09.2022 filed by the petitioner under Order 6, Rule 17 of CPC, finding the amendment to be formal in nature and necessary for proper adjudication. The dealing clerk was directed to implement the amendment in the compensation application form, and the case was adjourned to 19.06.2023 for next steps. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Feb-2023
Steps
District Judge
-
07-Dec-2022
Hearing
District Judge
-
27-Sep-2022
Hearing
District Judge
-
07-Jul-2022
Steps
District Judge
-
13-Apr-2022
Show Cause
District Judge
-
23-Feb-2022
Show Cause
District Judge
-
08-Dec-2021
Show Cause
District Judge
-
11-Aug-2021
Show Cause
District Judge
-
30-Jun-2021
Show Cause
District Judge
-
23-Apr-2021
Show Cause
District Judge
-
19-Feb-2021
Steps
District Judge
-
12-Oct-2020
Steps
District Judge
-
16-Apr-2020
Steps
District Judge
-
26-Feb-2020
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
26-Feb-2020
Steps
District Judge
-
10-Jan-2020
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
10-Dec-2019
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
20-Sep-2019
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
17-Jul-2019
Steps
District Judge
-
14-May-2019
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
13-Mar-2019
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
28-Jan-2019
Show Cause
District Judge
-
29-Nov-2018
Steps
District Judge
-
11-Sep-2018
Steps
District Judge
-
10-Jul-2018
Steps
District Judge
-
01-May-2018
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
26-Feb-2018
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
21-Dec-2017
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
30-Aug-2017
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
24-Dec-2016
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
29-Jun-2016
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
16-May-2016
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
11-Mar-2016
Steps
District Judge
-
15-Jan-2016
Steps
District Judge
-
18-Nov-2015
Steps
District Judge
-
29-Aug-2015
Steps
District Judge
-
21-Jul-2015
Steps
District Judge
-
10-Jun-2015
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
29-Apr-2015
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
13-Mar-2015
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
29-Jan-2015
Sr/Ad/Appearence
District Judge
-
01-Mar-2014
Steps
-
22-Jan-2014
Sr/Ad/Appearence
-
11-Dec-2013
Steps
-
08-Nov-2013
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Sep-2013
Case filed
Registration No. 1332/2014
Summary: The District Judge of Hooghly allowed the amendment petition dated 21.09.2022 filed by the petitioner under Order 6, Rule 17 of CPC, finding the amendment to be formal in nature and necessary for proper adjudication. The dealing clerk was directed to implement the amendment in the compensation application form, and the case was adjourned to 19.06.2023 for next steps. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts