Jagannath Roy vs State of West Bengal — 360/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBHG010008422026

Filing Number

543/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

360/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Hooghly

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jagannath Roy

    Adv. RAM CHANDRA DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case 360/2026 Summary: Jagannath Roy's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. was rejected by the Sessions Judge, Hooghly. Roy was accused in an FIR related to misappropriating funds and forging signatures at Medview Care Pvt., arising from a partnership dispute. The court found sufficient incriminating evidence through complainant statements, witness testimony, and documentary evidence, determining that custodial investigation was necessary at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 360/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 360/2026 Summary: Jagannath Roy's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. was rejected by the Sessions Judge, Hooghly. Roy was accused in an FIR related to misappropriating funds and forging signatures at Medview Care Pvt., arising from a partnership dispute. The court found sufficient incriminating evidence through complainant statements, witness testimony, and documentary evidence, determining that custodial investigation was necessary at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case