Md. Umar Faruk Mondal vs State of West Bengal — 310/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBHG010007512026

Filing Number

485/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

310/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Hooghly

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Md. Umar Faruk Mondal

    Adv. Dipanjan Ghosh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Hooghly granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Biswajit Santra and Swapan Santra in connection with Jangipara P.S. Case No. 59/2026 under BNSS sections 109(1)/115(2)/117(2)/329(4)/352/76/3(5). The court found merit in the bail prayer as the dispute was settled between parties (who are uncle and nephew) and the Public Prosecutor had no objection. Each petitioner must furnish a bond of Rs. 2,500 with one surety of equal amount. The court also directed the Chief Medical Officer, Hooghly to prepare injury reports properly instead of cryptically. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 310/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Hooghly granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Biswajit Santra and Swapan Santra in connection with Jangipara P.S. Case No. 59/2026 under BNSS sections 109(1)/115(2)/117(2)/329(4)/352/76/3(5). The court found merit in the bail prayer as the dispute was settled between parties (who are uncle and nephew) and the Public Prosecutor had no objection. Each petitioner must furnish a bond of Rs. 2,500 with one surety of equal amount. The court also directed the Chief Medical Officer, Hooghly to prepare injury reports properly instead of cryptically. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case