Aspia Khatun vs State of West Bengal — 268/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBHG010006212026

Filing Number

413/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

268/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Hooghly

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Aspia Khatun

    Adv. SABYASACHI GHOSH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case 268/2026 Summary: The Sessions Judge, Hooghly granted bail to petitioners Aspia Khatun and Yasmira Begam, who were accused of abetment of suicide under BNSS sections 126(2)/115(2)/108/61/351(2)/352/3(5) in connection with a matrimonial dispute case. The court found it premature to definitively determine whether the allegations constituted abetment of suicide but concluded custodial interrogation was unnecessary given the petitioners' gender and the nature of allegations. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 2,500 bond each with two sureties, with directions to cooperate with the investigating agency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 268/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 268/2026 Summary: The Sessions Judge, Hooghly granted bail to petitioners Aspia Khatun and Yasmira Begam, who were accused of abetment of suicide under BNSS sections 126(2)/115(2)/108/61/351(2)/352/3(5) in connection with a matrimonial dispute case. The court found it premature to definitively determine whether the allegations constituted abetment of suicide but concluded custodial interrogation was unnecessary given the petitioners' gender and the nature of allegations. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 2,500 bond each with two sureties, with directions to cooperate with the investigating agency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case