SMT. SUPRIYA DAS vs SRI ASHOKE DAS — 7/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section NONE. Status: Hearing of Petition. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
Money Execution
CNR: WBHG010004042026
Filing Number
152/2026
Filing Date
31-Jan-2026
Registration No
7/2026
Registration Date
31-Jan-2026
Court
Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Hooghly
Judge
1-District Judge
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. SUPRIYA DAS
Adv. SURAJIT GANGOPADHYAY
Respondent(s)
-
1.SRI ASHOKE DAS
Case History
-
02-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Jun-2026
Hearing of Petition
District Judge
-
16-May-2026
Awaiting for documents
District Judge
-
04-May-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Money Execution Case No. 07 of 2026 In this execution case where Smt. Supriya Das (decree-holder) sought to enforce an alimony order against Sri Ashoke Das (judgment-debtor), the District Judge of Hooghly found the execution application deficient. The decree-holder's descriptions of immovable property (a dwelling house) and movable property (furniture, motorcycle without registration number) failed to comply with CPC Order 21 Rules 13-14 requirements. The court directed the decree-holder to provide proper identification details and adjourned the case to 16/05/2026 for compliance with procedural requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Awaiting for documents
District Judge
-
28-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
28-Apr-2026
Awaiting for documents
District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing of Petition
District Judge
-
31-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 7/2026
Case Summary: Money Execution Case No. 07 of 2026 In this execution case where Smt. Supriya Das (decree-holder) sought to enforce an alimony order against Sri Ashoke Das (judgment-debtor), the District Judge of Hooghly found the execution application deficient. The decree-holder's descriptions of immovable property (a dwelling house) and movable property (furniture, motorcycle without registration number) failed to comply with CPC Order 21 Rules 13-14 requirements. The court directed the decree-holder to provide proper identification details and adjourned the case to 16/05/2026 for compliance with procedural requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts