Sk. Golam Mohiuddin vs Sk. Sabir Ali and Others — 3/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section None. Status: Sr/Ad/Appearence. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.

Sr/Ad/Appearence Next hearing 30-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Title Appeal

CNR: WBHG010003842025

Filing Number

155/2025

Filing Date

24-Jan-2025

Registration No

3/2025

Registration Date

24-Jan-2025

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Hooghly

Judge

1-District Judge

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section None

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sk. Golam Mohiuddin

    Adv. Tanmoy Mukherjee

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sk. Sabir Ali and Others

Case History

  1. 30-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: In Title Appeal Case No. 03 of 2025, the District Judge of Hooghly adjourned the case to 30.04.2026. Summons were successfully served on respondents 5, 7, 8, 9, and 10, though none appeared; summons to respondents 3 and 6 were returned unserved due to insufficient addresses. Respondent 1 (Sk Sabir Ali) appeared and was granted time to file a written objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  4. 11-Dec-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 11-Dec-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  6. 29-Oct-2025

    Hearing of Petition

    District Judge

  7. 23-Jul-2025

    Hearing of Petition

    District Judge

  8. 12-Jul-2025

    DC Fees

    District Judge

  9. 24-Apr-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  10. 24-Apr-2025

    DC Fees

    District Judge

  11. 24-Jan-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  12. 24-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 24-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Title Appeal Case No. 03 of 2025, the District Judge of Hooghly adjourned the case to 30.04.2026. Summons were successfully served on respondents 5, 7, 8, 9, and 10, though none appeared; summons to respondents 3 and 6 were returned unserved due to insufficient addresses. Respondent 1 (Sk Sabir Ali) appeared and was granted time to file a written objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case